Tiger vs Tortina cacao coated
Overall, Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tiger | Tortina cacao coated |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 364 kcal | 435 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 57 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tiger has 16% fewer calories (364 kcal vs 435 kcal).
- Tiger has 80% less fat (4.4 g vs 22 g).
- Tiger has 83% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 16 g).
- Tortina cacao coated has 37% less sugar (36 g vs 57 g).
- Tiger has 46% more protein (11 g vs 5.9 g).
Ingredients
Tiger
sucre de canne complet 60%, cacao fortement dégraissé 40%, vanille Bourbon. 100% issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Tortina cacao coated
TN TNA d 10 SNACKS wh lov EU./Origine de la farine: UE. Origine du cacao: non UE/Ursprung des Mehl EU. Ursprung des Kak Původ /Origine della farina: UE. Origine UE./ UE. / Mel oprindelse: EU. Kakao oprindelse: ikke-EU./Povod muky: EU. Pôvod kakaacao: non U
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tiger or Tortina cacao coated?
Overall, Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tiger has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 435 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tortina cacao coated has less sugar: 36 g versus 57 g per 100 g.