NESQUIK Cacao vs Tiger
Overall, NESQUIK Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | NESQUIK Cacao | Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 72 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 14 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- NESQUIK Cacao has 80% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 364 kcal).
- NESQUIK Cacao has 59% less fat (1.8 g vs 4.4 g).
- NESQUIK Cacao has 61% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- NESQUIK Cacao has 83% less sugar (9.5 g vs 57 g).
- Tiger has 96% more fiber (14 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tiger has 67% more protein (11 g vs 3.6 g).
- Tiger is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only NESQUIK Cacao lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
NESQUIK Cacao
Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre 23%*, émulsifiant : lécithine de SOJA, sel, vitamines : C, D, arôme naturel, cannelle. *Bilan massique certifié Rainforest Alliance www.ra.org/fr
Tiger
sucre de canne complet 60%, cacao fortement dégraissé 40%, vanille Bourbon. 100% issu de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: NESQUIK Cacao or Tiger?
Overall, NESQUIK Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
NESQUIK Cacao has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
NESQUIK Cacao has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 57 g per 100 g.