Comparison

NESQUIK Cacao vs UHT Cocoa Milkshake

Overall, NESQUIK Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNESQUIK CacaoUHT Cocoa Milkshake
Nutri-Score b —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 72 kcal 67 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 1 g
Sugars 9.5 g 10.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 3.6 g 2.7 g
Additives23
AllergensSoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • UHT Cocoa Milkshake has 17% less fat (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • NESQUIK Cacao has 10% less sugar (9.5 g vs 10.6 g).
  • NESQUIK Cacao has 25% more protein (3.6 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Only NESQUIK Cacao lists: Soybeans.
  • Only UHT Cocoa Milkshake lists: Milk.

Ingredients

NESQUIK Cacao

Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre 23%*, émulsifiant : lécithine de SOJA, sel, vitamines : C, D, arôme naturel, cannelle. *Bilan massique certifié Rainforest Alliance www.ra.org/fr

UHT Cocoa Milkshake

LECHE ENTERA, LECHE DESNATADA EN POLVO, LECHE DESNATADA, SUERO LACTEO EN POLVO, AZÚCAR, CACAO DESGRASADO (1,5%). ESTABILIZANTES (E-339, E-407) EMULGENTE (E-471) Y AROMAS *CERTIFICADO RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INGREDIENTS: LLET SENCERA, LLET DESNATADA EN POLS, LLET DESNATADA, SERUM LACTI EN POLS SUCRE, CACAU DESGREIXAT* (1.5%). ESTABILITZADORS (E-339, E-407). EMULGENT (E-471) I AROMES *CERTIFICAT RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INGREDIENTES: LEITE GORDO, LEITE inn Co

FAQ

Which is healthier: NESQUIK Cacao or UHT Cocoa Milkshake?

Overall, NESQUIK Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

UHT Cocoa Milkshake has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 72 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

NESQUIK Cacao has less sugar: 9.5 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons