Comparison

Hopacao vs UHT Cocoa Milkshake

Overall, UHT Cocoa Milkshake has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHopacaoUHT Cocoa Milkshake
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 370 kcal 67 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 1 g
Sugars 78.1 g 10.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 4.5 g 2.7 g
Additives23
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • UHT Cocoa Milkshake has 82% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 370 kcal).
  • UHT Cocoa Milkshake has 29% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
  • UHT Cocoa Milkshake has 23% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • UHT Cocoa Milkshake has 86% less sugar (10.6 g vs 78.1 g).
  • Hopacao has 40% more protein (4.5 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Only UHT Cocoa Milkshake lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Hopacao

sugar, 20% cacao , glucose, salt, e vitamin, c vitamin, b1 vitamin, b2 vitamin, b6 vitamin, niacin, b12 vitamin, biotin, folsav, cinks, lecithin, aromatizer,

UHT Cocoa Milkshake

LECHE ENTERA, LECHE DESNATADA EN POLVO, LECHE DESNATADA, SUERO LACTEO EN POLVO, AZÚCAR, CACAO DESGRASADO (1,5%). ESTABILIZANTES (E-339, E-407) EMULGENTE (E-471) Y AROMAS *CERTIFICADO RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INGREDIENTS: LLET SENCERA, LLET DESNATADA EN POLS, LLET DESNATADA, SERUM LACTI EN POLS SUCRE, CACAU DESGREIXAT* (1.5%). ESTABILITZADORS (E-339, E-407). EMULGENT (E-471) I AROMES *CERTIFICAT RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INGREDIENTES: LEITE GORDO, LEITE inn Co

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hopacao or UHT Cocoa Milkshake?

Overall, UHT Cocoa Milkshake has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

UHT Cocoa Milkshake has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

UHT Cocoa Milkshake has less sugar: 10.6 g versus 78.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons