Tiger vs Poudre de cacao
Overall, Poudre de cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tiger | Poudre de cacao |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 364 kcal | 323 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 11.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Sugars | 57 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 29.5 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 23.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poudre de cacao has 11% fewer calories (323 kcal vs 364 kcal).
- Tiger has 62% less fat (4.4 g vs 11.7 g).
- Tiger has 61% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 7.1 g).
- Poudre de cacao has 97% less sugar (1.8 g vs 57 g).
- Poudre de cacao has 53% more fiber (29.5 g vs 14 g).
- Poudre de cacao has 52% more protein (23.1 g vs 11 g).
- Poudre de cacao is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Tiger
sucre de canne complet 60%, cacao fortement dégraissé 40%, vanille Bourbon. 100% issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Poudre de cacao
Poudre de cacao
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tiger or Poudre de cacao?
Overall, Poudre de cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poudre de cacao has fewer calories: 323 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poudre de cacao has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 57 g per 100 g.