Tiger vs Hopacao
Overall, Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tiger | Hopacao |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 364 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 57 g | 78.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hopacao has 52% less fat (2.1 g vs 4.4 g).
- Hopacao has 54% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Tiger has 27% less sugar (57 g vs 78.1 g).
- Tiger has 59% more protein (11 g vs 4.5 g).
- Tiger is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Tiger
sucre de canne complet 60%, cacao fortement dégraissé 40%, vanille Bourbon. 100% issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Hopacao
sugar, 20% cacao , glucose, salt, e vitamin, c vitamin, b1 vitamin, b2 vitamin, b6 vitamin, niacin, b12 vitamin, biotin, folsav, cinks, lecithin, aromatizer,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tiger or Hopacao?
Overall, Tiger has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tiger has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tiger has less sugar: 57 g versus 78.1 g per 100 g.