Comparison

Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) vs Filets de maquereaux à l'huile d'olive vierge extra bio

Overall, Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon Pale (a L'huile Végétal...Filets de maquereaux à l'hui...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 186 kcal 255 kcal
Fat 8.6 g 19 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 4 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 25.7 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, SoybeansFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has 27% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 255 kcal).
  • Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has 55% less fat (8.6 g vs 19 g).
  • Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has 64% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 4 g).
  • Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has 18% more protein (25.7 g vs 21 g).
  • Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale)

THON LISTAO, HUILE DE SOYA, EAU, SEL.

Filets de maquereaux à l'huile d'olive vierge extra bio

Filets de maquereaux (Scomber scombrus) 55%, huile d'olive vierge extra*, sel. *44% des ingrédients d'origine agricole sont issus de l'Agriculture Biologique. Fabrication certifiée par FR-BIO-10 et distribution certifiée par FR-BIO-01.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) or Filets de maquereaux à l'huile d'olive vierge extra bio?

Overall, Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Thon Pale (a L'huile Végétale) has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons