Comparison

Thon à la catalane vs Thon à la Catalane

Overall, Thon à la Catalane has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon à la catalaneThon à la Catalane
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 116 kcal 99 kcal
Fat 5.6 g 4 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.3 g
Sugars 3.9 g 3.8 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Protein 10 g 10.6 g
Additives32
AllergensFish, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thon à la Catalane has 15% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 116 kcal).
  • Thon à la Catalane has 29% less fat (4 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Thon à la Catalane has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Only Thon à la catalane lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Thon à la catalane

Thon à la sauce et aux légumes - _Thon_ (28%), eau, concentré de tomate (20%), carottes (6%), oignons (6%), huile de colza, cornichons (dont _sulfites_) (3%), poivrons rouges (3%), vinaigre d'alcool, sucre, olives noires (1,5%), sel, amidon transformé de maïs, arômes, épaississants : gomme xanthane et gomme guar.

Thon à la Catalane

Thon 30% NUTR eau-concentré de tomates 15% - cornichons saumurés 10% (cornichons-100 eau-vinaigre d'alcool-sel - affermissant: chlorure de calcium) - carottes 9,3% - Energ huile de colza - oignons 3,1% - sucre - vinaigre de vin - sel - épaississants: Mats gome guar, gomme xanthane - amidon de riz - poivre - arôme naturel-colorant:

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon à la catalane or Thon à la Catalane?

Overall, Thon à la Catalane has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thon à la Catalane has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Thon à la Catalane has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons