Comparison

Terrine de Campagne biologique vs Pate

Overall, Pate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine de Campagne biologiq...Pate
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 306 kcal 145 kcal
Fat 28 g 11.2 g
Saturated fat 9.9 g 4.9 g
Sugars 0.8 g 3.1 g
Salt 1.5 g 1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.9 g
Protein 15 g 3.2 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, MilkEggs, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pate has 53% fewer calories (145 kcal vs 306 kcal).
  • Pate has 60% less fat (11.2 g vs 28 g).
  • Pate has 51% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Terrine de Campagne biologique has 74% less sugar (0.8 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Pate has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Pate has 45% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Terrine de Campagne biologique has 79% more protein (15 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Pate has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Terrine de Campagne biologique

Gorge de porc*, foie de porc* 30% minimum, épaule de porc*, LAIT*, OEUFS*, sel, cognac*, épices et aromates*. *biologiques. Élaboré à partir de viande origine UE

Pate

Roasted Mushrooms (24%) [Mushroom, Rapeseed Oil], Full Fat Soft Cheese (Milk) (17%), Water, Crème Fraîche (Milk), Single Cream (Milk), Onion, Lemon Juice, Rapeseed Oil, Tapioca Starch, Pasteurised Egg, Garlic Purée, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Salt, Mushroom Concentrate, Yeast Extract, Thyme, Rehydrated Potato, Porcini Mushroom, Black Pepper, Nutmeg, Lemon Juice Powder

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine de Campagne biologique or Pate?

Overall, Pate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate has fewer calories: 145 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine de Campagne biologique has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons