Comparison
Tapas lomo vs Lomo embuchado
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tapas lomo | Lomo embuchado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 203 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 39 g | 35 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tapas lomo has 15% less fat (5.7 g vs 6.7 g).
- Lomo embuchado has 16% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.3 g).
- Tapas lomo has 10% more protein (39 g vs 35 g).
Ingredients
Tapas lomo
Not available.
Lomo embuchado
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tapas lomo or Lomo embuchado?
Overall, Tapas lomo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lomo embuchado has fewer calories: 203 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lomo embuchado has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.