Comparison

Taboulé à l'oriental 200g vs Salade taboulé

Overall, Salade taboulé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTaboulé à l'oriental 200gSalade taboulé
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 182 kcal 142 kcal
Fat 8.1 g 5.1 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.8 g
Sugars 3.1 g 2.3 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.6 g
Fiber 2.2 g 2.1 g
Protein 3.6 g 4 g
Additives10
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, MustardGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade taboulé has 22% fewer calories (142 kcal vs 182 kcal).
  • Salade taboulé has 37% less fat (5.1 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Salade taboulé has 26% less sugar (2.3 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Salade taboulé has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Salade taboulé is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Taboulé à l'oriental 200g lists: Eggs, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Taboulé à l'oriental 200g

Semoule de BLE dur réhydratée* (origine France) 53,6%, huile de tournesol*, poivron rouge* 8,5%, tomate* 8,4%, eau, oignon* 4,3% , raisin sec* 2,8%, vinaigre de cidre*, vinaigre d'alcool*, menthe* 1,5%, sel, épices* et plantes aromatiques*, farine de riz*, MOUTARDE de dijon* (graines de MOUTARDE*, vinaigre d'alcool*, eau, sel), épaississant : gomme xanthane. * ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique. Traces éventuelles d autres céréales contenant du gluten, oeuf, lait et fruits à coque.

Salade taboulé

semoule de blé, légumes, raisins secs, menthe

FAQ

Which is healthier: Taboulé à l'oriental 200g or Salade taboulé?

Overall, Salade taboulé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade taboulé has fewer calories: 142 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade taboulé has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons