Comparison
Sweet & Saltt vs Studentenfutter
Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet & Saltt | Studentenfutter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 472 kcal | 490 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | — |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 18 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet & Saltt has 24% less fat (25 g vs 33 g).
- Studentenfutter has 43% less sugar (20 g vs 35 g).
- Studentenfutter has 69% more fiber (18 g vs 5.6 g).
- Studentenfutter has 28% more protein (18 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Sweet & Saltt
Not available.
Studentenfutter
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet & Saltt or Studentenfutter?
Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sweet & Saltt has fewer calories: 472 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Studentenfutter has less sugar: 20 g versus 35 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Studentenfutter - Exotic vs Studentenfutter
Studentenfutter vs Studentenfutter
Mélange de fruits secs vs Studentenfutter
Cranberry nuts vs Studentenfutter
Studentenfutter - Exotic vs Sweet & Saltt
Sweet & Saltt vs Studentenfutter
Sweet & Saltt vs Mélange de fruits secs
Sweet & Saltt vs Cranberry nuts