Sweet & Saltt vs Mélange de fruits secs
Overall, Mélange de fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet & Saltt | Mélange de fruits secs |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 472 kcal | 457 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 43 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 7.1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mélange de fruits secs has 34% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 19% less sugar (35 g vs 43 g).
- Mélange de fruits secs has no salt, while Sweet & Saltt has 0.3 g.
- Mélange de fruits secs has 21% more fiber (7.1 g vs 5.6 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 32% more protein (13 g vs 8.8 g).
Ingredients
Sweet & Saltt
Not available.
Mélange de fruits secs
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet & Saltt or Mélange de fruits secs?
Overall, Mélange de fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mélange de fruits secs has fewer calories: 457 kcal versus 472 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet & Saltt has less sugar: 35 g versus 43 g per 100 g.