Comparison

Sweet & Saltt vs Mélange de fruits secs

Overall, Mélange de fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSweet & SalttMélange de fruits secs
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 472 kcal 457 kcal
Fat 25 g 24 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 2.5 g
Sugars 35 g 43 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 5.6 g 7.1 g
Protein 13 g 8.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mélange de fruits secs has 34% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Sweet & Saltt has 19% less sugar (35 g vs 43 g).
  • Mélange de fruits secs has no salt, while Sweet & Saltt has 0.3 g.
  • Mélange de fruits secs has 21% more fiber (7.1 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Sweet & Saltt has 32% more protein (13 g vs 8.8 g).

Ingredients

Sweet & Saltt

Not available.

Mélange de fruits secs

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sweet & Saltt or Mélange de fruits secs?

Overall, Mélange de fruits secs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mélange de fruits secs has fewer calories: 457 kcal versus 472 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sweet & Saltt has less sugar: 35 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons