Comparison
Sweet & Saltt vs Cranberry nuts
Overall, Cranberry nuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet & Saltt | Cranberry nuts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 472 kcal | 477 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 36 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | — |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cranberry nuts has 29% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 3.8 g).
- Cranberry nuts has 22% more fiber (7.2 g vs 5.6 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 32% more protein (13 g vs 8.9 g).
Ingredients
Sweet & Saltt
Not available.
Cranberry nuts
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet & Saltt or Cranberry nuts?
Overall, Cranberry nuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sweet & Saltt has fewer calories: 472 kcal versus 477 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet & Saltt has less sugar: 35 g versus 36 g per 100 g.