Sweet & Saltt vs Studentenfutter
Overall, Sweet & Saltt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet & Saltt | Studentenfutter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 472 kcal | 442 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 39 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Studentenfutter has 20% less fat (20 g vs 25 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 65% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 11 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 10% less sugar (35 g vs 39 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 12% more fiber (5.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has 61% more protein (13 g vs 5.1 g).
- Sweet & Saltt has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Studentenfutter lists: Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sweet & Saltt
Not available.
Studentenfutter
uva sultanina (con otio di semi di cotone, olio di girasole), chips di banane zuccherate (banane, olio di cocco zucchero), papala candita (zucchero di canna, papaia, antiossidante: anidride solforosa), noce di cocco, nocciole, cranberries zuccherati (cranberries, zucchero, olio di girasole), noci d'acagiù, mandorle,e valeurs nutritives yalori nutritivi
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet & Saltt or Studentenfutter?
Overall, Sweet & Saltt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Studentenfutter has fewer calories: 442 kcal versus 472 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet & Saltt has less sugar: 35 g versus 39 g per 100 g.