Comparison

Studentenfutter vs Studentenfutter

Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientStudentenfutterStudentenfutter
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 442 kcal 490 kcal
Fat 20 g 33 g
Saturated fat 11 g 3.7 g
Sugars 39 g 20 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 4.9 g 18 g
Protein 5.1 g 18 g
Additives10
AllergensNuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Studentenfutter has 39% less fat (20 g vs 33 g).
  • Studentenfutter has 66% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 11 g).
  • Studentenfutter has 49% less sugar (20 g vs 39 g).
  • Studentenfutter has 73% more fiber (18 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Studentenfutter has 72% more protein (18 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Only Studentenfutter lists: Nuts, Peanuts, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Studentenfutter

uva sultanina (con otio di semi di cotone, olio di girasole), chips di banane zuccherate (banane, olio di cocco zucchero), papala candita (zucchero di canna, papaia, antiossidante: anidride solforosa), noce di cocco, nocciole, cranberries zuccherati (cranberries, zucchero, olio di girasole), noci d'acagiù, mandorle,e valeurs nutritives yalori nutritivi

Studentenfutter

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Studentenfutter or Studentenfutter?

Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Studentenfutter has fewer calories: 442 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Studentenfutter has less sugar: 20 g versus 39 g per 100 g.

More comparisons