Studentenfutter - Exotic vs Studentenfutter
Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Studentenfutter - Exotic | Studentenfutter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 490 kcal |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 42 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 8.4 g | 18 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Studentenfutter - Exotic has 21% fewer calories (388 kcal vs 490 kcal).
- Studentenfutter - Exotic has 47% less fat (17.5 g vs 33 g).
- Studentenfutter has 54% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 8 g).
- Studentenfutter has 52% less sugar (20 g vs 42 g).
- Studentenfutter has 53% more fiber (18 g vs 8.4 g).
- Studentenfutter has 63% more protein (18 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Studentenfutter - Exotic lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Studentenfutter - Exotic
31% ungeschwefelte Sultaninen (Sultaninen, Sonnenblumenöl), 19% Bananenchips gezuckert (Bananen, Kokosöl, Zucker), 16% Papaya kandiert (Papaya, Zucker, Antioxidations - mittel Schwefeldioxid), 11 % Kokoschips, 7 % blanchierte Mandelkerne, 6% Haselnuss - kerne, 5% Cashewkerne, 5% Cranberries gezuckert und getrocknet (Zucker, Cranberries, Sonnenblumenöl). Kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Studentenfutter
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Studentenfutter - Exotic or Studentenfutter?
Overall, Studentenfutter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Studentenfutter - Exotic has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 490 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Studentenfutter has less sugar: 20 g versus 42 g per 100 g.