Comparison

Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes vs Melamangio mele essiccate

Overall, Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSweet and Crisp Seedless Gra...Melamangio mele essiccate
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 73 kcal 355 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 17 g 78.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.6 g 13 g
Protein 0.6 g 1.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has 79% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 355 kcal).
  • Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has 77% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has 78% less sugar (17 g vs 78.6 g).
  • Melamangio mele essiccate has 95% more fiber (13 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Melamangio mele essiccate has 65% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes

Grapes

Melamangio mele essiccate

Mele Golden Italiane essiccate.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes or Melamangio mele essiccate?

Overall, Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sweet and Crisp Seedless Grapes has less sugar: 17 g versus 78.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons