Süßkirschen vs Cerezas en almíbar denso
Overall, Süßkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Süßkirschen
Cerezas en almíbar denso
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Süßkirschen | Cerezas en almíbar denso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 205 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.8 g | 48.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Süßkirschen has 59% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 205 kcal).
- Süßkirschen has 67% less sugar (15.8 g vs 48.5 g).
- Süßkirschen has 40% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Süßkirschen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Süßkirschen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Süßkirschen
Süßkirschen, Wasser, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.
Cerezas en almíbar denso
Cerezas, azúcar, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, acidulante (ácido cítrico), colorantes (E127, E120).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Süßkirschen or Cerezas en almíbar denso?
Overall, Süßkirschen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Süßkirschen has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 205 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Süßkirschen has less sugar: 15.8 g versus 48.5 g per 100 g.