Süßes Soft-Aprikosen vs Trockenobst
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Süßes Soft-Aprikosen | Trockenobst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 193 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 32 g | 31.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 24% fewer calories (193 kcal vs 255 kcal).
- Trockenobst has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Trockenobst has 33% more fiber (6.9 g vs 4.6 g).
- Trockenobst has 35% more protein (3.1 g vs 2 g).
- Only Süßes Soft-Aprikosen lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Aprikosen ensteint und getrocknet, Antioxidationsmittel: Schwefeldioxid
Trockenobst
Aprikosen aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Süßes Soft-Aprikosen or Trockenobst?
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trockenobst has less sugar: 31.2 g versus 32 g per 100 g.