Comparison
Abricot vs Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Overall, Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricot | Süßes Soft-Aprikosen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 182 kcal | 193 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 43.3 g | 32 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.6 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricot has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 26% less sugar (32 g vs 43.3 g).
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 70% more protein (2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Süßes Soft-Aprikosen lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Abricot
Not available.
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Aprikosen ensteint und getrocknet, Antioxidationsmittel: Schwefeldioxid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricot or Süßes Soft-Aprikosen?
Overall, Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricot has fewer calories: 182 kcal versus 193 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has less sugar: 32 g versus 43.3 g per 100 g.