Comparison
Abricots vs Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Overall, Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricots | Süßes Soft-Aprikosen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 193 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 32 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 4.6 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricots has 68% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 193 kcal).
- Abricots has 59% less sugar (13 g vs 32 g).
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 70% more fiber (4.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has 55% more protein (2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Süßes Soft-Aprikosen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Süßes Soft-Aprikosen lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Abricots
Oreillons d'abricots, eau, sucre
Süßes Soft-Aprikosen
Aprikosen ensteint und getrocknet, Antioxidationsmittel: Schwefeldioxid
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricots or Süßes Soft-Aprikosen?
Overall, Süßes Soft-Aprikosen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricots has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 193 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricots has less sugar: 13 g versus 32 g per 100 g.