Comparison
Abricots vs Trockenobst
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricots | Trockenobst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 31.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricots has 76% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 255 kcal).
- Abricots has 58% less sugar (13 g vs 31.2 g).
- Trockenobst has 80% more fiber (6.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Trockenobst has 71% more protein (3.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Trockenobst is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Abricots
Oreillons d'abricots, eau, sucre
Trockenobst
Aprikosen aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricots or Trockenobst?
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricots has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricots has less sugar: 13 g versus 31.2 g per 100 g.