Comparison
Abricots vs Trockenobst
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricots | Trockenobst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 31.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trockenobst has 71% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Trockenobst has 75% more fiber (6.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Trockenobst has 13% more protein (3.1 g vs 2.7 g).
Ingredients
Abricots
Abricots
Trockenobst
Aprikosen aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricots or Trockenobst?
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricots has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trockenobst has less sugar: 31.2 g versus 34 g per 100 g.