Comparison
Abricots vs Abricot
Overall, Abricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricots | Abricot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 182 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 43.3 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | — |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricots has 66% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 182 kcal).
- Abricots has 70% less sugar (13 g vs 43.3 g).
- Abricots has 33% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Abricots
Oreillons d'abricots, eau, sucre
Abricot
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricots or Abricot?
Overall, Abricots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricots has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricots has less sugar: 13 g versus 43.3 g per 100 g.