Comparison

Supergreens blend vs Lait d’amande

Overall, Supergreens blend has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSupergreens blendLait d’amande
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 310 kcal 390 kcal
Fat 2 g 12 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.1 g
Sugars 4.7 g 6 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 24.4 g 17 g
Protein 40.3 g 32 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Supergreens blend has 21% fewer calories (310 kcal vs 390 kcal).
  • Supergreens blend has 83% less fat (2 g vs 12 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 63% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 22% less sugar (4.7 g vs 6 g).
  • Lait d’amande has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 30% more fiber (24.4 g vs 17 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 21% more protein (40.3 g vs 32 g).
  • Supergreens blend is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Supergreens blend lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Lait d’amande lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Supergreens blend

30% Wheatgrass Powder, 25% Pea Protein Powder, 20% Barley Grass Powder, 15% Spinach Powder, 5% Ginger Powder, 5% Spirulina Powder (contains Sulphites).

Lait d’amande

_Amandes_* dégraissées partiellement (origine Sicile ou Espagne), sirop de riz* déshydraté, fibre d'acacia*, arôme naturel de vanille*. *Ingrédients issus d'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Supergreens blend or Lait d’amande?

Overall, Supergreens blend has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Supergreens blend has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Supergreens blend has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons