Comparison

Sustituto de leche vs Supergreens blend

Overall, Sustituto de leche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSustituto de lecheSupergreens blend
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 11 kcal 310 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.2 g 4.7 g
Salt 0 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g 24.4 g
Protein 0 g 40.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sustituto de leche has 96% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 310 kcal).
  • Sustituto de leche has 60% less fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
  • Sustituto de leche has 96% less sugar (0.2 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Sustituto de leche has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 100% more fiber (24.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 100% more protein (40.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Supergreens blend lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Sustituto de leche

Not available.

Supergreens blend

30% Wheatgrass Powder, 25% Pea Protein Powder, 20% Barley Grass Powder, 15% Spinach Powder, 5% Ginger Powder, 5% Spirulina Powder (contains Sulphites).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sustituto de leche or Supergreens blend?

Overall, Sustituto de leche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sustituto de leche has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 310 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sustituto de leche has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons