Comparison

Supergreens blend vs Instantané aux châtaignes

Overall, Supergreens blend has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSupergreens blendInstantané aux châtaignes
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 310 kcal 391 kcal
Fat 2 g 3.8 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.7 g 18.1 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 24.4 g —
Protein 40.3 g 6 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Supergreens blend has 21% fewer calories (310 kcal vs 391 kcal).
  • Supergreens blend has 47% less fat (2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 74% less sugar (4.7 g vs 18.1 g).
  • Instantané aux châtaignes has 84% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Supergreens blend has 85% more protein (40.3 g vs 6 g).
  • Supergreens blend has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Supergreens blend is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Supergreens blend lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Supergreens blend

30% Wheatgrass Powder, 25% Pea Protein Powder, 20% Barley Grass Powder, 15% Spinach Powder, 5% Ginger Powder, 5% Spirulina Powder (contains Sulphites).

Instantané aux châtaignes

Châtaignes instantanées* (55 %) maltodextrine de maïs*, amandes partiellement dégraissées*, sirop de riz*, sirop d'agave* protéine de pois*,huile d'amande*, arôme naturel*. * Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Supergreens blend or Instantané aux châtaignes?

Overall, Supergreens blend has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Supergreens blend has fewer calories: 310 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Supergreens blend has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 18.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons