Comparison

Sucre complet Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Sucre complet Muscovado

Sucre complet Muscovado

Destination · 500 g
e NOVA 2
Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura · 1000 g
e NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucre complet MuscovadoAlnatura Rohrohrzucker
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 394 kcal 388 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 95 g 97 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sucre complet Muscovado has no fat, while Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 0.5 g.
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sucre complet Muscovado

Sucre brut de canne issu de l'agriculture biologique

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Rohrohrzucker* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucre complet Muscovado or Alnatura Rohrohrzucker?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sucre complet Muscovado has less sugar: 95 g versus 97 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Sucre complet Muscovado vs Sucre Muscovado brun Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Azucar mascavado Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Mascabado genuino Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Sucre complet Muscovado vs Azucar mascavado