Sucre complet Muscovado vs Azucar mascavado
Overall, Sucre complet Muscovado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucre complet Muscovado | Azucar mascavado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 394 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 96 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucre complet Muscovado has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sucre complet Muscovado
Sucre brut de canne issu de l'agriculture biologique
Azucar mascavado
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucre complet Muscovado or Azucar mascavado?
Overall, Sucre complet Muscovado has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Azucar mascavado has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucre complet Muscovado has less sugar: 95 g versus 96 g per 100 g.