Comparison

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Azucar mascavado

Overall, Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura · 1000 g
e NOVA 2
Azucar mascavado

Azucar mascavado

RAR · 500 g
e NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlnatura RohrohrzuckerAzucar mascavado
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 388 kcal 383 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 97 g 96 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Azucar mascavado has no fat, while Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 0.5 g.
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Rohrohrzucker* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

Azucar mascavado

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alnatura Rohrohrzucker or Azucar mascavado?

Overall, Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Azucar mascavado has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Azucar mascavado has less sugar: 96 g versus 97 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Sucre Muscovado brun vs Azucar mascavado Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Sucre complet Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Mascabado genuino Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Rohrohr Zucker vs Azucar mascavado