Comparison

Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Overall, Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Rohrohr Zucker

Rohrohr Zucker

dennree · dennree
e NOVA 2
Better choice
Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura · 1000 g
e NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRohrohr ZuckerAlnatura Rohrohrzucker
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 390 kcal 388 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 97.4 g 97 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rohrohr Zucker has no fat, while Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 0.5 g.
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Rohrohr Zucker

Bio-Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Rohrohrzucker* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rohrohr Zucker or Alnatura Rohrohrzucker?

Overall, Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has less sugar: 97 g versus 97.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Sucre Muscovado brun vs Rohrohr Zucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Azucar mascavado Sucre complet Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Mascabado genuino Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Rohrohr Zucker vs Azucar mascavado