Comparison

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di canna

Overall, Zucchero integrale di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura · 1000 g
e NOVA 2
Better choice
Zucchero integrale di canna

Zucchero integrale di canna

Tropicana
NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlnatura RohrohrzuckerZucchero integrale di canna
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 388 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 97 g 97.6 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 0.5 g 0.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Zucchero integrale di canna has no fat, while Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 0.5 g.

Ingredients

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Rohrohrzucker* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

Zucchero integrale di canna

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alnatura Rohrohrzucker or Zucchero integrale di canna?

Overall, Zucchero integrale di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has less sugar: 97 g versus 97.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Mascabado genuino vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Muscovado vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Sucre Muscovado brun vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Azucar mascavado Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Sucre complet Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Mascabado genuino