Comparison

Mascabado genuino vs Zucchero integrale di canna

Overall, Zucchero integrale di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Mascabado genuino

Mascabado genuino

Metco
e NOVA 2
Better choice
Zucchero integrale di canna

Zucchero integrale di canna

Tropicana
NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMascabado genuinoZucchero integrale di canna
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 400 kcal 392 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 100 g 97.6 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Zucchero integrale di canna has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Mascabado genuino

Not available.

Zucchero integrale di canna

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mascabado genuino or Zucchero integrale di canna?

Overall, Zucchero integrale di canna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zucchero integrale di canna has fewer calories: 392 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Zucchero integrale di canna has less sugar: 97.6 g versus 100 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Muscovado vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Sucre Muscovado brun vs Mascabado genuino Sucre Muscovado brun vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Mascabado genuino Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Azucar mascavado vs Mascabado genuino Azucar mascavado vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Rohrohr Zucker vs Mascabado genuino