Comparison

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Mascabado genuino

Overall, Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Alnatura · 1000 g
e NOVA 2
Mascabado genuino

Mascabado genuino

Metco
e NOVA 2

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlnatura RohrohrzuckerMascabado genuino
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 388 kcal 400 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 97 g 100 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mascabado genuino has no fat, while Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 0.5 g.
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker

Rohrohrzucker* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

Mascabado genuino

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alnatura Rohrohrzucker or Mascabado genuino?

Overall, Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alnatura Rohrohrzucker has less sugar: 97 g versus 100 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Sucre Muscovado brun vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Mascabado genuino vs Zucchero integrale di ca... Sucre Muscovado brun vs Mascabado genuino Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Azucar mascavado Rohrohr Zucker vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Sucre complet Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Muscovado vs Alnatura Rohrohrzucker Alnatura Rohrohrzucker vs Zucchero integrale di ca...