Comparison

St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei vs Martinettes Puur 60%

Overall, St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSt. Dalfour Vruchtenspread A...Martinettes Puur 60%
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 202 kcal 538 kcal
Fat 0 g 36.6 g
Saturated fat 0 g 21.9 g
Sugars 48 g 36.9 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.1 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 6.7 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has 62% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 538 kcal).
  • St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has no fat, while Martinettes Puur 60% has 36.6 g.
  • St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has no saturated fat, while Martinettes Puur 60% has 21.9 g.
  • Martinettes Puur 60% has 23% less sugar (36.9 g vs 48 g).
  • St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Martinettes Puur 60% has 100% more protein (6.7 g vs 0 g).
  • St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Martinettes Puur 60% lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei

strawberries 51%, unsweetened fruit juice concentrates (grape, date), gelling agent : fruit pectin, lemon juice

Martinettes Puur 60%

Cacaomassa, suiker, cacaoboter, emulgator (_soja_lecithinen), natuurlijk vanillearoma,

FAQ

Which is healthier: St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei or Martinettes Puur 60%?

Overall, St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

St. Dalfour Vruchtenspread Aardbei has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Martinettes Puur 60% has less sugar: 36.9 g versus 48 g per 100 g.

More comparisons