Sriracha chilly sauce vs Original Sweet Chilli Sauce
Overall, Sriracha chilly sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sriracha chilly sauce | Original Sweet Chilli Sauce |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 224 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 27 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 7.8 g | 3.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sriracha chilly sauce has 42% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 224 kcal).
- Sriracha chilly sauce has 41% less sugar (27 g vs 46 g).
- Original Sweet Chilli Sauce has 61% less salt (3.1 g vs 7.8 g).
- Sriracha chilly sauce has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
- Sriracha chilly sauce has 50% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Sriracha chilly sauce
Piment rouge 55%, sucre, eau, sel, ail 5%, amidon transformé de maïs, correcteur d'acidité: acide acétique, épaississant: gomme xanthane. Traces éventuelles de gluten, arachides, poisson, graines de sésame et de soja.
Original Sweet Chilli Sauce
Water, Red Chillies 20%) Sugar, Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Ground Garlic (6%), Pickled Garlic (5%) [Garlic, Water, Salt, Acid (Acetic Acid)], Modified Tapioca Starch, Acid (Acetic Acid), Salt. NUTRITIONAL INFO Average Values Energy 937) Fat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sriracha chilly sauce or Original Sweet Chilli Sauce?
Overall, Sriracha chilly sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sriracha chilly sauce has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sriracha chilly sauce has less sugar: 27 g versus 46 g per 100 g.