Comparison
Speck stagionato vs Galbanetto
Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Speck stagionato | Galbanetto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 19.1 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 30.7 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Speck stagionato has 18% less saturated fat (6.6 g vs 8 g).
- Galbanetto has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Galbanetto has 29% less salt (2.7 g vs 3.8 g).
Ingredients
Speck stagionato
Not available.
Galbanetto
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Speck stagionato or Galbanetto?
Overall, Galbanetto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Speck stagionato has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Galbanetto has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.