Speck des Alpes vs Pancetta Copatta
Overall, Speck des Alpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Speck des Alpes | Pancetta Copatta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 28 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Speck des Alpes has 31% fewer calories (256 kcal vs 373 kcal).
- Speck des Alpes has 52% less fat (16 g vs 33 g).
- Speck des Alpes has 49% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 12 g).
- Pancetta Copatta has 22% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.6 g).
- Speck des Alpes has 32% more protein (28 g vs 19 g).
- Only Speck des Alpes lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Speck des Alpes
pork, salt, spices, natural flavors, dextrose, fructose, antioxidants: sodium ascorbate, preservatives: sodium nitrite,
Pancetta Copatta
Schweinebauch, Schweinenacken, Salz, Dextrose, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Gewürze und Kräuter, Konservierungsstoffe: Kaliumnitrat, Natriumnitrit; Aromen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Speck des Alpes or Pancetta Copatta?
Overall, Speck des Alpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Speck des Alpes has fewer calories: 256 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Speck des Alpes has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.