Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipes de carbassa crues
Overall, Pipes de carbassa crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sonnenblumenkerne | Pipes de carbassa crues |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 643 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 56.5 g | 49 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.8 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 23.8 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 13% less fat (49 g vs 56.5 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has 26% less saturated fat (6.4 g vs 8.7 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 50% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Sonnenblumenkerne has 23% more fiber (7.8 g vs 6 g).
- Pipes de carbassa crues has 21% more protein (30 g vs 23.8 g).
- Only Pipes de carbassa crues lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Sonnenblumenkerne
Bio Sonnenblumenkerne geschält
Pipes de carbassa crues
Pipes de carbassa (origen: Xina). gluten_soja_llet_fruits_de_closca_grans_de_sèsam
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sonnenblumenkerne or Pipes de carbassa crues?
Overall, Pipes de carbassa crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipes de carbassa crues has fewer calories: 618 kcal versus 643 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipes de carbassa crues has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.