Soja Schnetzel vs Natto organic.
Overall, Soja Schnetzel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soja Schnetzel | Natto organic. |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 371 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 9.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 7.2 g | 6.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 15 g | — |
| Protein | 52 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Gluten, Mustard, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Natto organic. has 50% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 371 kcal).
- Soja Schnetzel has 23% less fat (7.6 g vs 9.9 g).
- Natto organic. has 13% less sugar (6.3 g vs 7.2 g).
- Soja Schnetzel has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
- Soja Schnetzel has 73% more protein (52 g vs 14 g).
- Soja Schnetzel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Soja Schnetzel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Natto organic. lists: Gluten, Mustard.
Ingredients
Soja Schnetzel
SOJABOHNEN*. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft
Natto organic.
(Natto):SOJABOHNEN, Bazillus Natto, (Sauce): Wasser, SOJASAÙCE(ŠOJABOHNEN, WEIZEN, Salz, Alkohol). Glucose-Fructose Sirup mit Zucker, Fructose-glucose sirup, Salz, Hydrolysierte Eiweiss(enthaelt SOJA), Zucker, Suesskochreiswein, Hefeextrakt, BONITOEXTRAKT, Glucose, Branntweinessig, (Senf): Wasser, SENF, Branntweinessig, Maltose, Salz, Chili Nührwertangaben je 100g Brennwert (kjkcal) Fett
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soja Schnetzel or Natto organic.?
Overall, Soja Schnetzel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Natto organic. has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 371 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natto organic. has less sugar: 6.3 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.