Soft White Farmhouse vs White Ciabattin
Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Soft White Farmhouse
White Ciabattin
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Soft White Farmhouse | White Ciabattin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 266 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White Ciabattin has 11% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 266 kcal).
- White Ciabattin has 73% less fat (0.7 g vs 2.6 g).
- White Ciabattin has 79% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- White Ciabattin has 22% more fiber (3 g vs 2.3 g).
- White Ciabattin has the better Nutri-Score.
- White Ciabattin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soft White Farmhouse lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Soft White Farmhouse
Wheat Flour [with Calcium, Iron, Niacin (B3) and Thiamin (B1)], Water, Yeast, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed and Sustainable Palm), Salt, Soya Flour, Preservative: Calcium Propionate; Emulsifiers:E481, E471; Flour Treatment Agents: Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), E920 (Vegetarian); Flavouring.
White Ciabattin
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Salt, Fermented Wheat Flour.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soft White Farmhouse or White Ciabattin?
Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White Ciabattin has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 266 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White Ciabattin has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.