Wraps de blé souples x6 370g vs White Ciabattin
Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wraps de blé souples x6 370g | White Ciabattin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 326 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 7.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White Ciabattin has 27% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 326 kcal).
- White Ciabattin has 90% less fat (0.7 g vs 7.3 g).
- White Ciabattin has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- White Ciabattin has 34% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- White Ciabattin has 23% more fiber (3 g vs 2.3 g).
- White Ciabattin has the better Nutri-Score.
- White Ciabattin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Wraps de blé souples x6 370g
Farine de BLÉ 67%, eau, huile de colza, stabilisant : glycérol - dextrose, acidifiant: acide malique - poudre à lever: bicarbonate de sodium - sel, émulsifiant : mono et diglycérides d'acides gras, conservateur : propionate de calcium, agent de traitement de la farine : l-cystéine.
White Ciabattin
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Salt, Fermented Wheat Flour.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wraps de blé souples x6 370g or White Ciabattin?
Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White Ciabattin has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White Ciabattin has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.