Comparison

Original Toastie Soft & Sliced White Loaf vs White Ciabattin

Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOriginal Toastie Soft & Slic...White Ciabattin
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 244 kcal 230 kcal
Fat 2 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 3 g 2.4 g
Salt 1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 2.3 g 2.9 g
Protein 9.1 g 10.1 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White Ciabattin has 60% less fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
  • White Ciabattin has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • White Ciabattin has 20% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3 g).
  • White Ciabattin has 21% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.3 g).
  • White Ciabattin has the better Nutri-Score.
  • White Ciabattin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Original Toastie Soft & Sliced White Loaf lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Original Toastie Soft & Sliced White Loaf

_Wheat_ Flour [with Calcium, Iron, Niacin (B3) and Thiamin (B1)], Water, Yeast, Salt, Vegetable Oils (Rapeseed and Sustainable Palm), _Soya_ Flour, Preservative: Calcium Propionate; Emulsifiers: E472e, E481; Flour Treatment Agent: Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C).

White Ciabattin

Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Salt, Fermented Wheat Flour.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Original Toastie Soft & Sliced White Loaf or White Ciabattin?

Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

White Ciabattin has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

White Ciabattin has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons