White Ciabattin vs Everyday White Rolls
Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White Ciabattin | Everyday White Rolls |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 10.1 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- White Ciabattin has 29% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3.4 g).
- White Ciabattin has 38% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
White Ciabattin
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Salt, Fermented Wheat Flour.
Everyday White Rolls
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Rye Flour, Yeast, Fermented Wheat Flour, Salt, Flour Treatment Agent: Ascorbic Acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: White Ciabattin or Everyday White Rolls?
Overall, White Ciabattin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White Ciabattin has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 245 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
White Ciabattin has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.