Snoepgroente: Wortelen vs Tomaten
Overall, Snoepgroente: Wortelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Snoepgroente: Wortelen | Tomaten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | — |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Snoepgroente: Wortelen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Snoepgroente: Wortelen
Wortel, antioxidant (calciumascorbaat [E302]).
Tomaten
Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 gram EU Landbouw
FAQ
Which is healthier: Snoepgroente: Wortelen or Tomaten?
Overall, Snoepgroente: Wortelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomaten has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Snoepgroente: Wortelen has less sugar: 4 g versus 4 g per 100 g.