Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce vs Cuisse de canard
Overall, Cuisse de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Slow cooked duck legs with p... | Cuisse de canard |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 156 kcal |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 15.7 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuisse de canard has 22% less fat (8.2 g vs 10.5 g).
- Cuisse de canard has 18% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Cuisse de canard has no sugar, while Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce has 2 g.
- Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce has 61% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Cuisse de canard has 25% more protein (21 g vs 15.7 g).
- Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce lists: Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce
British Duck Legs (76%) Port and Orange Sauce (22%) Cracked Black Pepper Sea Salt. • 4 PORT AND ORANGE SAUCE contains Water Onions Chicken Stock (Water Chicken Bones Onions Carrots Leeks Parsley Garlic White Peppercorns Bay Leaves) Ruby Port (contains Sulphites). Duck Stock (Water Duck Bones Carrots Onions Tomato Purée. Dried Oregano Dried Thyme Ground Black Pepper Bay Leaves Garlic) Concentrated Orange Juice Cornflour Unsalted Butter (Milk) Rapeseed Oil Demerara Sugar Sugar Salt Roasted Garlic Purée Dried Porcini Mushrooms Concentrated Redcurrant Juice Orange Zest Thyme
Cuisse de canard
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Slow cooked duck legs with port & orange sauce or Cuisse de canard?
Overall, Cuisse de canard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuisse de canard has fewer calories: 156 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuisse de canard has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.