Skyr vs Philadelphia nature 300g
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skyr | Philadelphia nature 300g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 220 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr has 74% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 220 kcal).
- Skyr has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 21 g).
- Skyr has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 14 g).
- Philadelphia nature 300g has 21% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.9 g).
- Skyr has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Skyr has 55% more protein (10 g vs 4.5 g).
- Skyr has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Skyr
Lait écrémé, ferments lactiques (lait). Lait: Origine France
Philadelphia nature 300g
whole milk, cream, milk protein preparation, whey permeate milk concentrate, salt, stabilizers (carob seed flour), acidifier (citric acid),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skyr or Philadelphia nature 300g?
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 220 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Philadelphia nature 300g has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.