Skyr vs Elah Panna Cotta Caramel
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Skyr | Elah Panna Cotta Caramel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 7.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 16.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Skyr has 71% fewer calories (57 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Skyr has 98% less fat (0.2 g vs 13 g).
- Skyr has 77% less sugar (3.9 g vs 16.7 g).
- Skyr has 67% more protein (10 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Skyr lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Skyr
Lait écrémé, ferments loctiques (lait).
Elah Panna Cotta Caramel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Skyr or Elah Panna Cotta Caramel?
Overall, Skyr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Skyr has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Skyr has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 16.7 g per 100 g.