Sirop de riz vs Gerstenmalz extrakt
Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sirop de riz | Gerstenmalz extrakt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 312 kcal | 288 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 53.6 g | 45 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gerstenmalz extrakt has 16% less sugar (45 g vs 53.6 g).
- Gerstenmalz extrakt has 90% more protein (5 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Sirop de riz
Riz complet issu de l'agriculture biologique.
Gerstenmalz extrakt
_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sirop de riz or Gerstenmalz extrakt?
Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 312 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gerstenmalz extrakt has less sugar: 45 g versus 53.6 g per 100 g.