Comparison

Sirop de riz vs Gerstenmalz extrakt

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSirop de rizGerstenmalz extrakt
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 312 kcal 288 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 53.6 g 45 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 1.1 g —
Protein 0.5 g 5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 16% less sugar (45 g vs 53.6 g).
  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 90% more protein (5 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Sirop de riz

Riz complet issu de l'agriculture biologique.

Gerstenmalz extrakt

_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sirop de riz or Gerstenmalz extrakt?

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 312 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has less sugar: 45 g versus 53.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons